Papers › Dual Operating Modes of In-Context Learning

Dual Operating Modes of In-Context Learning

29 Feb 2024arXiv:2402.18819archive 2025-07-28

Ziqian Lin, Kangwook Lee

In-context learning (ICL) exhibits dual operating modes: task learning, i.e., acquiring a new skill from in-context samples, and task retrieval, i.e., locating and activating a relevant pretrained skill. Recent theoretical work investigates various mathematical models to analyze ICL, but existing models explain only one operating mode at a time. We introduce a probabilistic model, with which one can explain the dual operating modes of ICL simultaneously. Focusing on in-context learning of linear functions, we extend existing models for pretraining data by introducing multiple task groups and task-dependent input distributions. We then analyze the behavior of the optimally pretrained model under the squared loss, i.e., the MMSE estimator of the label given in-context examples. Regarding pretraining task distribution as prior and in-context examples as the observation, we derive the closed-form expression of the task posterior distribution. With the closed-form expression, we obtain a quantitative understanding of the two operating modes of ICL. Furthermore, we shed light on an unexplained phenomenon observed in practice: under certain settings, the ICL risk initially increases and then decreases with more in-context examples. Our model offers a plausible explanation for this "early ascent" phenomenon: a limited number of in-context samples may lead to the retrieval of an incorrect skill, thereby increasing the risk, which will eventually diminish as task learning takes effect with more in-context samples. We also theoretically analyze ICL with biased labels, e.g., zero-shot ICL, where in-context examples are assigned random labels. Lastly, we validate our findings and predictions via experiments involving Transformers and large language models.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 4 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-25; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 4 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from uw-madison-lee-lab/dual_operating_modes_of_icl. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections