Papers › Doubly robust and computationally efficient high-dimensional variable selection
Doubly robust and computationally efficient high-dimensional variable selection
Abhinav Chakraborty, Jeffrey Zhang, Eugene Katsevich
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Variable selection can be performed by testing conditional independence (CI) between each predictor and the response, given the other predictors. A doubly robust and powerful option for these CI tests is the projected covariance measure (PCM) test. However, directly deploying PCM for variable selection brings computational challenges: testing a single variable involves a few machine learning fits, so testing p variables requires O(p) fits. Inspired by model-X ideas, we observe that an estimate of the joint predictor distribution and a single response-on-all-predictors fit can be used to reconstruct all PCM fits. This yields tower PCM (tPCM), a computationally efficient extension of PCM to variable selection. When the joint predictor distribution is sufficiently tractable, as in applications like genome-wide association studies, tPCM offers a substantial speedup over PCM -- up to 130× in our simulations -- while matching its power. tPCM also improves on model-X methods like knockoffs and holdout randomization test (HRT) by returning per-variable p-values and improving speed, respectively. We prove that tPCM is doubly robust and asymptotically equivalent to both PCM and HRT. We thus extend the bridge between model-X and doubly robust approaches, demonstrating their independent arrival at equivalent methods and showing that this intersection is a fruitful source of new methodologies like tPCM.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections