Papers › Does the Performance of Text-to-Image Retrieval Models Generalize Beyond Captions-as-a-Query?

Does the Performance of Text-to-Image Retrieval Models Generalize Beyond Captions-as-a-Query?

15 Mar 2024European Conference on Information Retrieval 2024 3archive 2025-07-28

Juan Manuel Rodriguez, Nima Tavassoli, Eliezer Levy, Gil Lederman, Dima Sivov, Matteo Lissandrini, Davide Mottin

Text-image retrieval (T2I) refers to the task of recovering all images relevant to a keyword query. Popular datasets for text-image retrieval, such as Flickr30k, VG, or MS-COCO, utilize annotated image captions, e.g., “a man playing with a kid”, as a surrogate for queries. With such surrogate queries, current multi-modal machine learning models, such as CLIP or BLIP, perform remarkably well. The main reason is the descriptive nature of captions, which detail the content of an image. Yet, T2I queries go beyond the mere descriptions in image-caption pairs. Thus, these datasets are ill-suited to test methods on more abstract or conceptual queries, e.g., “family vacations”. In such queries, the image content is implied rather than explicitly described. In this paper, we replicate the T2I results on descriptive queries and generalize them to conceptual queries. To this end, we perform new experiments on a novel T2I benchmark for the task of conceptual query answering, called ConQA. ConQA comprises 30 descriptive and 50 conceptual queries on 43k images with more than 100 manually annotated images per query. Our results on established measures show that both large pretrained models (e.g., CLIP, BLIP, and BLIP2) and small models (e.g., SGRAF and NAAF), perform up to 4x better on descriptive rather than conceptual queries. We also find that the models perform better on queries with more than 6 keywords as in MS-COCO captions.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

DescriptiveImage CaptioningImage RetrievalRetrieval

Datasets

Introduced by this paper, per the archive.

ConQA

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual CLIP R-precision 6.8 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual CLIP Recall@1 12.2 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual CLIP Recall@10 36.7 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual CLIP Recall@5 30.6 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual BLIP 2 R-precision 5.4 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual BLIP 2 Recall@1 8.2 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual BLIP 2 Recall@10 36.7 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual BLIP 2 Recall@5 28.6 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual BLIP R-precision 5.4 #3 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual BLIP Recall@1 4.1 #3 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual BLIP Recall@10 40.8 #3 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual BLIP Recall@5 28.6 #3 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual NAAF R-precision 2.4 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual NAAF Recall@1 4.1 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual NAAF Recall@10 16.3 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual NAAF Recall@5 12.2 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual SGRAF R-precision 1.3 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual SGRAF Recall@1 0.0 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual SGRAF Recall@10 10.2 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Conceptual SGRAF Recall@5 8.2 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive CLIP R-precision 16.5 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive CLIP Recall@1 20.7 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive CLIP Recall@10 65.5 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive CLIP Recall@5 58.3 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive BLIP R-precision 15.3 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive BLIP Recall@1 20.7 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive BLIP Recall@10 62.1 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive BLIP Recall@5 58.3 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive BLIP-2 R-precision 15.3 #3 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive BLIP-2 Recall@1 20.7 #3 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive BLIP-2 Recall@10 62.1 #3 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive BLIP-2 Recall@5 51.7 #3 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive NAAF R-precision 10.6 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive NAAF Recall@1 13.8 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive NAAF Recall@10 44.8 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive NAAF Recall@5 34.5 #4 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive SGRAF R-precision 7.9 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive SGRAF Recall@1 6.9 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive SGRAF Recall@10 34.5 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Image Retrieval ConQA Descriptive SGRAF Recall@5 24.1 #5 of 5 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

BLIPCLIP

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections