Papers › Does Oversizing Improve Prosumer Profitability in a Flexibility Market? -- A...

Does Oversizing Improve Prosumer Profitability in a Flexibility Market? -- A Sensitivity Analysis using PV-battery System

22 Nov 2021arXiv:2111.11193archive 2025-07-28

Babu Kumaran Nalini, Michel Zade, Zhengjie You, Peter Tzscheutschler, Ulrich Wagner

The possibilities to involve small-scale prosumers for ancillary services in the distribution grid through aggregators and local flexibility markets question whether it is profitable for prosumers to oversize proactively. In this analysis, a Python model is developed to identify the cost-optimal operation plan of the PV-battery system and to evaluate the device flexibility. An economic assessment is carried out to derive the cost-benefit of sizing based on the mean electricity price. A sensitivity analysis is performed with the above results to study the profitable sizing of PV-battery systems with flexibility services. The results show a promising advantage of oversizing although limitations prevail with the extent of flexibility services offered.

PaperPDFCode

Code

babukumarannalini/sizingflexibility officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Sensitivity

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections