Papers › Does local pruning offer task-specific models to learn effectively ?

Does local pruning offer task-specific models to learn effectively ?

1 Sep 2021RANLP 2021 9archive 2025-07-28

Abhishek Kumar Mishra, Mohna Chakraborty

The need to deploy large-scale pre-trained models on edge devices under limited computational resources has led to substantial research to compress these large models. However, less attention has been given to compress the task-specific models. In this work, we investigate the different methods of unstructured pruning on task-specific models for Aspect-based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA) tasks. Specifically, we analyze differences in the learning dynamics of pruned models by using the standard pruning techniques to achieve high-performing sparse networks. We develop a hypothesis to demonstrate the effectiveness of local pruning over global pruning considering a simple CNN model. Later, we utilize the hypothesis to demonstrate the efficacy of the pruned state-of-the-art model compared to the over-parameterized state-of-the-art model under two settings, the first considering the baselines for the same task used for generating the hypothesis, i.e., aspect extraction and the second considering a different task, i.e., sentiment analysis. We also provide discussion related to the generalization of the pruning hypothesis.

PaperPDFCode

Code

abhishekkumarm98/local_vs_global-pruning officialmentioned in paperpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Aspect ExtractionAspect-Based Sentiment AnalysisAspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (ABSA)Sentiment Analysis

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Pruning

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections