Papers › Does Higher Order LSTM Have Better Accuracy for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data?

Does Higher Order LSTM Have Better Accuracy for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data?

22 Nov 2017COLING 2018 8arXiv:1711.08231archive 2025-07-28

Yi Zhang, Xu sun, Shuming Ma, Yang Yang, Xuancheng Ren

Existing neural models usually predict the tag of the current token independent of the neighboring tags. The popular LSTM-CRF model considers the tag dependencies between every two consecutive tags. However, it is hard for existing neural models to take longer distance dependencies of tags into consideration. The scalability is mainly limited by the complex model structures and the cost of dynamic programming during training. In our work, we first design a new model called "high order LSTM" to predict multiple tags for the current token which contains not only the current tag but also the previous several tags. We call the number of tags in one prediction as "order". Then we propose a new method called Multi-Order BiLSTM (MO-BiLSTM) which combines low order and high order LSTMs together. MO-BiLSTM keeps the scalability to high order models with a pruning technique. We evaluate MO-BiLSTM on all-phrase chunking and NER datasets. Experiment results show that MO-BiLSTM achieves the state-of-the-art result in chunking and highly competitive results in two NER datasets.

PaperPDFConference PDFCode

Code

lancopku/Multi-Order-LSTM officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubtf report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

ChunkingNERTAG

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

BiLSTMLSTMPruningSigmoid ActivationTanh Activation

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections