Papers › Do Ensembling and Meta-Learning Improve Outlier Detection in Randomized Controlled Trials?
Do Ensembling and Meta-Learning Improve Outlier Detection in Randomized Controlled Trials?
Walter Nelson, Jonathan Ranisau, Jeremy Petch
Modern multi-centre randomized controlled trials (MCRCTs) collect massive amounts of tabular data, and are monitored intensively for irregularities by humans. We began by empirically evaluating 6 modern machine learning-based outlier detection algorithms on the task of identifying irregular data in 838 datasets from 7 real-world MCRCTs with a total of 77,001 patients from over 44 countries. Our results reinforce key findings from prior work in the outlier detection literature on data from other domains. Existing algorithms often succeed at identifying irregularities without any supervision, with at least one algorithm exhibiting positive performance 70.6% of the time. However, performance across datasets varies substantially with no single algorithm performing consistently well, motivating new techniques for unsupervised model selection or other means of aggregating potentially discordant predictions from multiple candidate models. We propose the Meta-learned Probabilistic Ensemble (MePE), a simple algorithm for aggregating the predictions of multiple unsupervised models, and show that it performs favourably compared to recent meta-learning approaches for outlier detection model selection. While meta-learning shows promise, small ensembles outperform all forms of meta-learning on average, a negative result that may guide the application of current outlier detection approaches in healthcare and other real-world domains.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections