Papers › DNABERT-2: Efficient Foundation Model and Benchmark For Multi-Species Genome
DNABERT-2: Efficient Foundation Model and Benchmark For Multi-Species Genome
Zhihan Zhou, Yanrong Ji, Weijian Li, Pratik Dutta, Ramana Davuluri, Han Liu
Decoding the linguistic intricacies of the genome is a crucial problem in biology, and pre-trained foundational models such as DNABERT and Nucleotide Transformer have made significant strides in this area. Existing works have largely hinged on k-mer, fixed-length permutations of A, T, C, and G, as the token of the genome language due to its simplicity. However, we argue that the computation and sample inefficiencies introduced by k-mer tokenization are primary obstacles in developing large genome foundational models. We provide conceptual and empirical insights into genome tokenization, building on which we propose to replace k-mer tokenization with Byte Pair Encoding (BPE), a statistics-based data compression algorithm that constructs tokens by iteratively merging the most frequent co-occurring genome segment in the corpus. We demonstrate that BPE not only overcomes the limitations of k-mer tokenization but also benefits from the computational efficiency of non-overlapping tokenization. Based on these insights, we introduce DNABERT-2, a refined genome foundation model that adapts an efficient tokenizer and employs multiple strategies to overcome input length constraints, reduce time and memory expenditure, and enhance model capability. Furthermore, we identify the absence of a comprehensive and standardized benchmark for genome understanding as another significant impediment to fair comparative analysis. In response, we propose the Genome Understanding Evaluation (GUE), a comprehensive multi-species genome classification dataset that amalgamates $36$ distinct datasets across $9$ tasks, with input lengths ranging from $70$ to $10000$. Through comprehensive experiments on the GUE benchmark, we demonstrate that DNABERT-2 achieves comparable performance to the state-of-the-art model with 21 × fewer parameters and approximately 92 × less GPU time in pre-training.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2306.15006")
Code
Syntology Ran 8 of 23 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 15 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 3 ran · our draft was wrong; 1 ran · fixture could not drive it; 3 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 23 samples from 2 repositories, 8 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
23 samples harvested; 8 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 15 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 23 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
0f786c407fb1ee4c · report
f1c7f50e43f8c65f · report
82086191fd1b0dae · report
4c10b29b9932aaac · report
77601724cad03f95 · report
dbf4ecb6112f8eef · report
e819e759304fc70a · report
9c99ec96528c0f00 · report
48ac189cd4db0ad9 · report
3386604c83d5235b · report
810c58679e40ef3e · report
f82f6d515d78b9fa · report
f90d502733dc3fc8 · report
d72aad474f62da31 · report
ce7a1b8194d588f0 · report
6957915768d8a616 · report
c4e9c025a630c701 · report
2f4b4de6eea982fe · report
0e02bf4a27dbaf92 · report
c91ea05b2f9c818a · report
2f94f1febf69f788 · report
97526e4fc5605ed7 · report
86ed11d1b2a6f597 · report
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Datasets
Introduced by this paper, per the archive.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Core Promoter Detection | GUE | DNABERT-2-117M | MCC | 70.52 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Covid Variant Prediction | GUE | DNABERT-2-117M | Avg F1 | 71.02 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Epigenetic Marks Prediction | GUE | DNABERT-2-117M | MCC | 55.98 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Promoter Detection | GUE | DNABERT-2-117M | MCC | 84.21 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Splice Site Prediction | GUE | DNABERT-2-117M | MCC | 84.99 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction (Human) | GUE | DNABERT-2-117M | MCC | 70.10 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Transcription Factor Binding Site Prediction (Mouse) | GUE | DNABERT-2-117M | MCC | 67.99 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections