Papers › DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learning

DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learning

18 Feb 2020ICLR 2020 1arXiv:2002.07394archive 2025-07-28

Junnan Li, Richard Socher, Steven C. H. Hoi

Deep neural networks are known to be annotation-hungry. Numerous efforts have been devoted to reducing the annotation cost when learning with deep networks. Two prominent directions include learning with noisy labels and semi-supervised learning by exploiting unlabeled data. In this work, we propose DivideMix, a novel framework for learning with noisy labels by leveraging semi-supervised learning techniques. In particular, DivideMix models the per-sample loss distribution with a mixture model to dynamically divide the training data into a labeled set with clean samples and an unlabeled set with noisy samples, and trains the model on both the labeled and unlabeled data in a semi-supervised manner. To avoid confirmation bias, we simultaneously train two diverged networks where each network uses the dataset division from the other network. During the semi-supervised training phase, we improve the MixMatch strategy by performing label co-refinement and label co-guessing on labeled and unlabeled samples, respectively. Experiments on multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate substantial improvements over state-of-the-art methods. Code is available at https://github.com/LiJunnan1992/DivideMix .

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2002.07394")

Code

Syntology Ran 0 of 2 code samples harvested from 0 repositories linked to this paper; 2 have no recorded run.

By repository: 2 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

LiJunnan1992/DivideMix officialmentioned in paperpytorchMIT report
jyansir/text2tree mentioned on GitHubpytorchMIT report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

2 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 2 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

2unverified

Licence: 2 of the 2 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

eval_train identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 8a2d14d95795c655 · report
linear_rampup identical code first harvested elsewhere unverified licence of this copy not recorded · 767f49a34c3cb79a · report

Tasks

Image ClassificationLearning with noisy labels

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Classification Clothing1M DivideMix Accuracy 74.76% #15 of 51 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification mini WebVision 1.0 DivideMix (Inception-ResNet-v2) ImageNet Top-1 Accuracy 75.20 #31 of 47 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification mini WebVision 1.0 DivideMix (Inception-ResNet-v2) ImageNet Top-5 Accuracy 91.64 #31 of 47 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification mini WebVision 1.0 DivideMix (Inception-ResNet-v2) Top-1 Accuracy 77.32 #31 of 47 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification mini WebVision 1.0 DivideMix (Inception-ResNet-v2) Top-5 Accuracy 91.64 #31 of 47 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification mini WebVision 1.0 DivideMix (ResNet-50) ImageNet Top-1 Accuracy 74.42 ±0.29 #33 of 47 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification mini WebVision 1.0 DivideMix (ResNet-50) ImageNet Top-5 Accuracy 91.21 ±0.12 #33 of 47 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification mini WebVision 1.0 DivideMix (ResNet-50) Top-1 Accuracy 76.32 ±0.36 #33 of 47 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification mini WebVision 1.0 DivideMix (ResNet-50) Top-5 Accuracy 90.65 ±0.16 #33 of 47 Archive leaderboard report
Image Classification mini WebVision 1.0 DivideMix (ResNet-18) Top-1 Accuracy 76.08 #34 of 47 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-100N Divide-Mix Accuracy (mean) 71.13 #4 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Aggregate Divide-Mix Accuracy (mean) 95.01 #7 of 26 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random1 Divide-Mix Accuracy (mean) 90.18 #14 of 24 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random2 Divide-Mix Accuracy (mean) 90.90 #8 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Random3 Divide-Mix Accuracy (mean) 89.97 #12 of 23 Archive leaderboard report
Learning with noisy labels CIFAR-10N-Worst Divide-Mix Accuracy (mean) 92.56 #6 of 25 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections