Papers › DiT-3D: Exploring Plain Diffusion Transformers for 3D Shape Generation

DiT-3D: Exploring Plain Diffusion Transformers for 3D Shape Generation

4 Jul 2023NeurIPS 2023 11arXiv:2307.01831archive 2025-07-28

Shentong Mo, Enze Xie, Ruihang Chu, Lewei Yao, Lanqing Hong, Matthias Nießner, Zhenguo Li

Recent Diffusion Transformers (e.g., DiT) have demonstrated their powerful effectiveness in generating high-quality 2D images. However, it is still being determined whether the Transformer architecture performs equally well in 3D shape generation, as previous 3D diffusion methods mostly adopted the U-Net architecture. To bridge this gap, we propose a novel Diffusion Transformer for 3D shape generation, namely DiT-3D, which can directly operate the denoising process on voxelized point clouds using plain Transformers. Compared to existing U-Net approaches, our DiT-3D is more scalable in model size and produces much higher quality generations. Specifically, the DiT-3D adopts the design philosophy of DiT but modifies it by incorporating 3D positional and patch embeddings to adaptively aggregate input from voxelized point clouds. To reduce the computational cost of self-attention in 3D shape generation, we incorporate 3D window attention into Transformer blocks, as the increased 3D token length resulting from the additional dimension of voxels can lead to high computation. Finally, linear and devoxelization layers are used to predict the denoised point clouds. In addition, our transformer architecture supports efficient fine-tuning from 2D to 3D, where the pre-trained DiT-2D checkpoint on ImageNet can significantly improve DiT-3D on ShapeNet. Experimental results on the ShapeNet dataset demonstrate that the proposed DiT-3D achieves state-of-the-art performance in high-fidelity and diverse 3D point cloud generation. In particular, our DiT-3D decreases the 1-Nearest Neighbor Accuracy of the state-of-the-art method by 4.59 and increases the Coverage metric by 3.51 when evaluated on Chamfer Distance.

PaperPDFConference PDFCodeCode Syntology ran

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2307.01831")

Code

Syntology Ran 2 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 1 has no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 1 ran · our draft was wrong.

By repository: community (archive-listed): 2 samples from 1 repository, 1 ran; 1 identical to code first harvested elsewhere. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.

DiT-3D/DiT-3D mentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

3 samples harvested; 2 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

1ran · honoured contract
1ran · our draft was wrong
1unverified

Licence: 1 of the 3 samples is pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from DiT-3D/DiT-3D. Some samples are identical code Syntology first harvested from another repository; for those, this paper's copy is not located and its licence is not recorded. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

get_3d_sincos_pos_embed DiT-3D/DiT-3D/models/dit3d.py community (archive-listed) ran · honoured contract Apache-2.0 (permissive) · a4339312e5467413 · report
get_3d_sincos_pos_embed_from_grid DiT-3D/DiT-3D/models/dit3d.py community (archive-listed) unverified Apache-2.0 (permissive) · 296657bd96abcae6 · report
modulate identical code first harvested elsewhere ran · our draft was wrong fingerprinted licence of this copy not recorded · 03310bba324ae4fb · report

Tasks

3D Shape GenerationDenoisingPhilosophyPoint Cloud Generation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Point Cloud Generation ShapeNet Airplane DiT-3D 1-NNA-CD 62.35 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Point Cloud Generation ShapeNet Airplane DiT-3D CD 53.16 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Point Cloud Generation ShapeNet Airplane DiT-3D EMD 54.39 #2 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Point Cloud Generation ShapeNet Car DiT-3D 1-NNA-CD 51.04 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Point Cloud Generation ShapeNet Car DiT-3D CD 56.15 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Point Cloud Generation ShapeNet Car DiT-3D EMD 50.86 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Point Cloud Generation ShapeNet Chair DiT-3D 1-NNA-CD 51.99 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Point Cloud Generation ShapeNet Chair DiT-3D CD 54.76 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report
Point Cloud Generation ShapeNet Chair DiT-3D EMD 57.37 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Methods

Absolute Position EncodingsAdamAttentionBPEConcatenated Skip ConnectionConvolutionDense ConnectionsDiffusionDropoutLabel SmoothingLayer NormalizationLinear LayerMax PoolingMulti-Head AttentionPosition-Wise Feed-Forward LayerReLUResidual ConnectionSoftmaxTransformerU-Net

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections