Papers › Distributional regression: CRPS-error bounds for model fitting, model selection and...

Distributional regression: CRPS-error bounds for model fitting, model selection and convex aggregation

21 Nov 2024arXiv:2411.13974links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Clément Dombry, Ahmed Zaoui

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Distributional regression aims at estimating the conditional distribution of a targetvariable given explanatory co-variates. It is a crucial tool for forecasting whena precise uncertainty quantification is required. A popular methodology consistsin fitting a parametric model via empirical risk minimization where the risk ismeasured by the Continuous Rank Probability Score (CRPS). For independentand identically distributed observations, we provide a concentration result for theestimation error and an upper bound for its expectation. Furthermore, we considermodel selection performed by minimization of the validation error and provide aconcentration bound for the regret. A similar result is proved for convex aggregationof models. Finally, we show that our results may be applied to various models suchas Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS), distributional regression networks,distributional nearest neighbors or distributional random forests and we illustrateour findings on two data sets (QSAR aquatic toxicity and Airfoil self-noise).

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections