Papers › Distributional Discrepancy: A Metric for Unconditional Text Generation
Distributional Discrepancy: A Metric for Unconditional Text Generation
Ping Cai, Xingyuan Chen, Peng Jin, Hongjun Wang, Tianrui Li
The purpose of unconditional text generation is to train a model with real sentences, then generate novel sentences of the same quality and diversity as the training data. However, when different metrics are used for comparing the methods of unconditional text generation, contradictory conclusions are drawn. The difficulty is that both the diversity and quality of the sample should be considered simultaneously when the models are evaluated. To solve this problem, a novel metric of distributional discrepancy (DD) is designed to evaluate generators based on the discrepancy between the generated and real training sentences. However, it cannot compute the DD directly because the distribution of real sentences is unavailable. Thus, we propose a method for estimating the DD by training a neural-network-based text classifier. For comparison, three existing metrics, bi-lingual evaluation understudy (BLEU) versus self-BLEU, language model score versus reverse language model score, and Fr\'{e}chet embedding distance, along with the proposed DD, are used to evaluate two popular generative models of long short-term memory and generative pretrained transformer 2 on both syntactic and real data. Experimental results show that DD is significantly better than the three existing metrics for ranking these generative models.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections