Papers › Distributed non-disclosive validation of predictive models by a modified ROC-GLM
Distributed non-disclosive validation of predictive models by a modified ROC-GLM
Daniel Schalk, Verena S. Hoffmann, Bernd Bischl, Ulrich Mansmann
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Distributed statistical analyses provide a promising approach for privacy protection when analysing data distributed over several databases. It brings the analysis to the data and not the data to the analysis. The analyst receives anonymous summary statistics which are combined to a aggregated result. We are interested to calculate the AUC of a prediction score based on a distributed approach without getting to know the data of involved individual subjects distributed over different databases. We use DataSHIELD as the technology to carry out distributed analyses and use a newly developed algorithms to perform the validation of the prediction score. Calibration can easily be implemented in the distributed setting. But, discrimination represented by a respective ROC curve and its AUC is challenging. We base our approach on the ROC-GLM algorithm as well as on ideas of differential privacy. The proposed algorithms are evaluated in a simulation study. A real-word application is described: The audit use case of DIFUTURE (Medical Informatics Initiative) with the goal to validate a treatment prediction rule of patients with newly diagnosed multiple sclerosis.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections