Papers › Distributed maze exploration using multiple agents and optimal goal assignment
Distributed maze exploration using multiple agents and optimal goal assignment
Manousos Linardakis, Iraklis Varlamis, Georgios Th. Papadopoulos
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Robotic exploration has long captivated researchers aiming to map complex environments efficiently. Techniques such as potential fields and frontier exploration have traditionally been employed in this pursuit, primarily focusing on solitary agents. Recent advancements have shifted towards optimizing exploration efficiency through multiagent systems. However, many existing approaches overlook critical real-world factors, such as broadcast range limitations, communication costs, and coverage overlap. This paper addresses these gaps by proposing a distributed maze exploration strategy (CU-LVP) that assumes constrained broadcast ranges and utilizes Voronoi diagrams for better area partitioning. By adapting traditional multiagent methods to distributed environments with limited broadcast ranges, this study evaluates their performance across diverse maze topologies, demonstrating the efficacy and practical applicability of the proposed method. The code and experimental results supporting this study are available in the following repository: https://github.com/manouslinard/multiagent-exploration/.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections