Papers › Disintegrating Exoplanets: Creating Size Constraints by Statistically Peering Through...

Disintegrating Exoplanets: Creating Size Constraints by Statistically Peering Through the Debris

24 Nov 2021arXiv:2111.12688links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Keith Baka, Everett Schlawin

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

We study two intriguing exoplanets, Kepler-1520b and K2-22b, that are being disintegrated by their host stars, producing dust and debris pulled from their surface into tails that trail and precede the exoplanets in their orbits, making it difficult to discern the true nature of the objects. Our goal is to constrain the radius of the underlying objects, and while previous studies have done this in the past by selecting shallow transit events, we attempt a new statistical approach to model the intrinsic astrophysical and photon noise distributions simultaneously. We assume that the lightcurve flux distribution is distributed as a convolution of a Gaussian photon noise component and a Raleigh astrophysical component. The Raleigh curve has a finite flux maximum, which we fit with a Hamiltonian Markov Chain. With these methods, a more accurate flux maximum may be estimated, producing a better final value for the radius of these exoplanets. To determine statistical significance, we used the python package PyMC3 to find the posterior distribution for our data with Gaussian, Rayleigh, and joint function curves and plotting it against our collected flux. After completing this analysis, we were able to place a constraint on the maximum radius of K2-22b at approximately 15,000km. However, we were unable to constrain the radius of Kepler-1520b due to either transits obscured by forward scattering of dust or a grazing transit.

PaperPDFCode

Code

bakak17/disintegrating-exoplanets officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections