Papers › Discrete-time Competing-Risks Regression with or without Penalization

Discrete-time Competing-Risks Regression with or without Penalization

2 Mar 2023arXiv:2303.01186archive 2025-07-28

Tomer Meir, Malka Gorfine

Many studies employ the analysis of time-to-event data that incorporates competing risks and right censoring. Most methods and software packages are geared towards analyzing data that comes from a continuous failure time distribution. However, failure-time data may sometimes be discrete either because time is inherently discrete or due to imprecise measurement. This paper introduces a new estimation procedure for discrete-time survival analysis with competing events. The proposed approach offers a major key advantage over existing procedures and allows for straightforward integration and application of widely used regularized regression and screening-features methods. We illustrate the benefits of our proposed approach by a comprehensive simulation study. Additionally, we showcase the utility of the proposed procedure by estimating a survival model for the length of stay of patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit, considering three competing events: discharge to home, transfer to another medical facility, and in-hospital death. A Python package, PyDTS, is available for applying the proposed method with additional features.

PaperPDFCode

Code

tomer1812/discretetimesurvivalpenalization officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report
tomer1812/pydts officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Survival Analysisregression

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections