Papers › Discrete Dynamical System Approaches for Boolean Polynomial Optimization

Discrete Dynamical System Approaches for Boolean Polynomial Optimization

21 Dec 2019arXiv:1912.10221links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Yi-Shuai Niu, Roland Glowinski

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

In this article, we discuss the numerical solution of Boolean polynomial programs by algorithms borrowing from numerical methods for differential equations, namely the Houbolt scheme, the Lie scheme, and a Runge-Kutta scheme. We first introduce a quartic penalty functional (of Ginzburg-Landau type) to approximate the Boolean program by a continuous one and prove some convergence results as the penalty parameter ε converges to $0$. We prove also that, under reasonable assumptions, the distance between local minimizers of the penalized problem and the set {±1}ⁿ is of order O(√(n)ε). Next, we introduce algorithms for the numerical solution of the penalized problem, these algorithms relying on the Houbolt, Lie and Runge-Kutta schemes, classical methods for the numerical solution of ordinary or partial differential equations. We performed numerical experiments to investigate the impact of various parameters on the convergence of the algorithms. We have tested our ODE approaches and compared with the classical nonlinear optimization solver IPOPT and a quadratic binary formulation approach (QB-G) as well as an exhaustive method using parallel computing techniques. The numerical results on various datasets (including small and large-scale randomly generated synthetic datasets of general Boolean polynomial optimization problems, and a large-scale heterogeneous MQLib benchmark dataset of Max-Cut and Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems) show good performances for our ODE approaches. As a result, our ODE algorithms often converge faster than the other compared methods to better integer solutions of the Boolean program.

PaperPDFCode

Code

niuyishuai/DEMIPP officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections