Papers › Discovery and Vetting of Exoplanets I: Benchmarking K2 Vetting Tools
Discovery and Vetting of Exoplanets I: Benchmarking K2 Vetting Tools
Veselin B. Kostov, Susan E. Mullally, Elisa V. Quintana, Jeffrey L. Coughlin, Fergal Mullally, Thomas Barclay, Knicole D. Colon, Joshua E. Schlieder, Geert Barentsen, Christopher J. Burke
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We have adapted the algorithmic tools developed during the Kepler mission to vet the quality of transit-like signals for use on the K2 mission data. Using the four sets of publicly-available lightcurves on MAST, we produced a uniformly-vetted catalog of 772 transiting planet candidates from K2 as listed at the NASA Exoplanet archive in the K2 Table of Candidates. Our analysis marks 676 of these as planet candidates and 96 as false positives. All confirmed planets pass our vetting tests. 60 of our false positives are new identifications -- effectively doubling the overall number of astrophysical signals mimicking planetary transits in K2 data. Most of the targets listed as false positives in our catalog either show prominent secondary eclipses, transit depths suggesting a stellar companion instead of a planet, or significant photocenter shifts during transit. We packaged our tools into the open-source, automated vetting pipeline DAVE (Discovery and Vetting of Exoplanets) designed to streamline follow-up efforts by reducing the time and resources wasted observing targets that are likely false positives. DAVE will also be a valuable tool for analyzing planet candidates from NASA's TESS mission, where several guest-investigator programs will provide independent lightcurve sets -- and likely many more from the community. We are currently testing DAVE on recently-released TESS planet candidates and will present our results in a follow-up paper.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections