Papers › Discovering Diverse Solutions in Deep Reinforcement Learning by Maximizing...
Discovering Diverse Solutions in Deep Reinforcement Learning by Maximizing State-Action-Based Mutual Information
Takayuki Osa, Voot Tangkaratt, Masashi Sugiyama
Reinforcement learning algorithms are typically limited to learning a single solution for a specified task, even though diverse solutions often exist. Recent studies showed that learning a set of diverse solutions is beneficial because diversity enables robust few-shot adaptation. Although existing methods learn diverse solutions by using the mutual information as unsupervised rewards, such an approach often suffers from the bias of the gradient estimator induced by value function approximation. In this study, we propose a novel method that can learn diverse solutions without suffering the bias problem. In our method, a policy conditioned on a continuous or discrete latent variable is trained by directly maximizing the variational lower bound of the mutual information, instead of using the mutual information as unsupervised rewards as in previous studies. Through extensive experiments on robot locomotion tasks, we demonstrate that the proposed method successfully learns an infinite set of diverse solutions by learning continuous latent variables, which is more challenging than learning a finite number of solutions. Subsequently, we show that our method enables more effective few-shot adaptation compared with existing methods.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections