Papers › Discontinuous epidemic transition due to limited testing

Discontinuous epidemic transition due to limited testing

14 Jun 2020arXiv:2006.08005links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Davide Scarselli, Nazmi Burak Budanur, Marc Timme, Björn Hof

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

High impact epidemics constitute one of the largest threats humanity is facing in the 21st century. Testing, contact tracing and quarantining are critical in slowing down epidemic dynamics, but may prove insufficient for highly contagious diseases. In the absence of pharmaceutical interventions, physical distancing measures remain as the last resort to avoid a widespread outbreak. Here we show that such combined countermeasures drastically change the rules of the epidemic transition if testing capacities are limited: Instead of continuous the response to countermeasures becomes discontinuous and rather than following the conventional exponential growth, the outbreak accelerates and scales super-exponentially during an intermediate period. As a consequence, containment measures either suffice to stop the outbreak at low total case numbers or fail catastrophically if marginally too weak, thus implying large uncertainties in reliably estimating overall epidemic dynamics, both during initial phases and during second wave scenarios.

PaperPDFCode

Code

burakbudanur/gridemic mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections