Papers › DINOv2 Rocks Geological Image Analysis: Classification, Segmentation, and Interpretability
DINOv2 Rocks Geological Image Analysis: Classification, Segmentation, and Interpretability
Florent Brondolo, Samuel Beaussant
Recent advancements in computer vision have significantly improved image analysis tasks. Yet, deep learning models often struggle when applied to domains outside their training distribution, such as in geosciences, where domain-specific data can be scarce. This study investigates the classification, segmentation, and interpretability of CT-scan images of rock samples, focusing on the application of modern computer vision techniques to geoscientific tasks. We compare a range of segmentation methods to assess their efficacy, efficiency, and adaptability in geological image analysis. The methods evaluated include Otsu thresholding, clustering techniques (K-means, fuzzy C-means), a supervised machine learning approach (Random Forest), and deep learning models (UNet, ResNet152, and DINOv2), using ten binary sandstone datasets and three multi-class calcite datasets. DINOv2 was selected for its promising results in feature extraction and its potential applicability in geoscientific tasks, prompting further assessment of its interpretability and effectiveness in processing CT-scanned rock data. For classification, a non-fine-tuned DINOv2 demonstrates strong performance in classifying rock images, even when the CT-scans are outside its original training set. In segmentation tasks, thresholding and clustering techniques, though computationally efficient, produce subpar results despite preprocessing efforts. In contrast, supervised methods achieve better performance. While deep learning methods demand greater computational resources, they require minimal intervention and offer superior generalization. A LoRA fine-tuned DINOv2, in particular, excels in out-of-distribution segmentation and outperforms other methods in multi-class tasks, even with limited data. Notably, the segmentation masks generated by DINOv2 often appear more accurate than the original targets, based on visual inspection.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections