Papers › Extending global-local view alignment for self-supervised learning with remote sensing imagery
Extending global-local view alignment for self-supervised learning with remote sensing imagery
Xinye Wanyan, Sachith Seneviratne, Shuchang Shen, Michael Kirley
Since large number of high-quality remote sensing images are readily accessible, exploiting the corpus of images with less manual annotation draws increasing attention. Self-supervised models acquire general feature representations by formulating a pretext task that generates pseudo-labels for massive unlabeled data to provide supervision for training. While prior studies have explored multiple self-supervised learning techniques in remote sensing domain, pretext tasks based on local-global view alignment remain underexplored, despite achieving state-of-the-art results on natural imagery. Inspired by DINO, which employs an effective representation learning structure with knowledge distillation based on global-local view alignment, we formulate two pretext tasks for self-supervised learning on remote sensing imagery (SSLRS). Using these tasks, we explore the effectiveness of positive temporal contrast as well as multi-sized views on SSLRS. We extend DINO and propose DINO-MC which uses local views of various sized crops instead of a single fixed size in order to alleviate the limited variation in object size observed in remote sensing imagery. Our experiments demonstrate that even when pre-trained on only 10% of the dataset, DINO-MC performs on par or better than existing state-of-the-art SSLRS methods on multiple remote sensing tasks, while using less computational resources. All codes, models, and results are released at https://github.com/WennyXY/DINO-MC.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2303.06670")
Code
Syntology Ran 0 of 3 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 3 have no recorded run.
By repository: official repository: 3 samples from 1 repository, 0 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
3 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 3 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 3 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from wennyxy/dino-mc. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
94226f82998bee03 · report
661c1e5b701aeb47 · report
7c32be5780f45ebb · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change Detection | OSCD - 13ch | DINO-MC (WRN-50) | F1 | 52.7 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Change Detection | OSCD - 13ch | DINO-MC (WRN-50) | Precision | 49.99 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | EuroSAT | DINO-MC (Wide ResNet) | Accuracy (%) | 98.78 | #8 of 15 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Image Classification | EuroSAT | DINO-MC (WRN linear eval)) | Accuracy (%) | 95.7 | #14 of 15 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Multi-Label Image Classification | BigEarthNet | DINO-MC | mAP (micro) | 88.75 | #5 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Multi-Label Image Classification | BigEarthNet | DINO-MC | official split | No | #5 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Multi-Label Image Classification | BigEarthNet-10% | DINO-MC | mean average precision | 84.20 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections