Papers › Difference-in-Differences with a Continuous Treatment

Difference-in-Differences with a Continuous Treatment

6 Jul 2021arXiv:2107.02637archive 2025-07-28

Brantly Callaway, Andrew Goodman-Bacon, Pedro H. C. Sant'Anna

This paper analyzes difference-in-differences designs with a continuous treatment. We show that treatment effect on the treated-type parameters can be identified under a generalized parallel trends assumption that is similar to the binary treatment setup. However, interpreting differences in these parameters across different values of the treatment can be particularly challenging due to selection bias that is not ruled out by the parallel trends assumption. We discuss alternative, typically stronger, assumptions that alleviate these challenges. We also provide a variety of treatment effect decomposition results, highlighting that parameters associated with popular linear two-way fixed-effects specifications can be hard to interpret, \emph{even} when there are only two time periods. We introduce alternative estimation procedures that do not suffer from these drawbacks and show in an application that they can lead to different conclusions.

PaperPDFCode

Code

bernardodionisi/differences mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Selection bias

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections