Papers › Deviation test construction and power comparison for marked spatial point patterns

Deviation test construction and power comparison for marked spatial point patterns

5 Jun 2013arXiv:1306.1028links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Mari Myllymäki, Pavel Grabarnik, Henri Seijo, Dietrich Stoyan

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The deviation test belong to core tools in point process statistics, where hypotheses are typically tested considering differences between an empirical summary function and its expectation under the null hypothesis, which depend on a distance variable r. This test is a classical device to overcome the multiple comparison problem which appears since the functional differences have to be considered for a range of distances r simultaneously. The test has three basic ingredients: (i) choice of a suitable summary function, (ii) transformation of the summary function or scaling of the differences, and (iii) calculation of a global deviation measure. We consider in detail the construction of such tests both for stationary and finite point processes and show by two toy examples and a simulation study for the case of the random labelling hypothesis that the points (i) and (ii) have great influence on the power of the tests.

PaperPDFCode

Code

myllym/GET mentioned on GitHub report
myllym/spptest mentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections