Papers › Determining the ⁵⁶Ni distribution of type Ia supernovae from observations within days...

Determining the ⁵⁶Ni distribution of type Ia supernovae from observations within days of explosion

16 Dec 2019arXiv:1912.07603links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

M. R. Magee, K. Maguire, R. Kotak, S. A. Sim, J. H. Gillanders, S. J. Prentice, K. Skillen

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Recent studies have shown how the distribution of ⁵⁶Ni within the ejecta of type Ia supernovae can have profound consequences on the observed light curves. Observations at early times can therefore provide important details on the explosion physics in thermonuclear supernovae. We present a series of radiative transfer calculations that explore variations in the ⁵⁶Ni distribution. Our models also show the importance of the density profile in shaping the light curve, which is often neglected in the literature. Using our model set, we investigate the observations that are necessary to determine the ⁵⁶Ni distribution as robustly as possible within the current model set. We find that this includes observations beginning at least ∼14 days before B-band maximum, extending to approximately maximum light with a high (≲3 day) cadence, and in at least one blue and one red band are required (such as B and R, or g and r). We compare a number of well-observed type Ia supernovae that meet these criteria to our models and find that the light curves of ∼70-80% of objects in our sample are consistent with being produced solely by variations in the ⁵⁶Ni distributions. The remaining supernovae show an excess of flux at early times, indicating missing physics that is not accounted for within our model set, such as an interaction or the presence of short-lived radioactive isotopes. Comparing our model light curves and spectra to observations and delayed detonation models demonstrates that while a somewhat extended ⁵⁶Ni distribution is necessary to reproduce the observed light curve shape, this does not negatively affect the spectra at maximum light. Investigating current explosion models shows that observations typically require a shallower decrease in the ⁵⁶Ni mass towards the outer ejecta than is produced for models of a given ⁵⁶Ni mass.

PaperPDFCode

Code

MarkMageeAstro/TURTLS-Light-curves officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections