Papers › Detecting Discrepancies Between AI-Generated and Natural Images Using Uncertainty

Detecting Discrepancies Between AI-Generated and Natural Images Using Uncertainty

8 Dec 2024arXiv:2412.05897archive 2025-07-28

Jun Nie, Yonggang Zhang, Tongliang Liu, Yiu-ming Cheung, Bo Han, Xinmei Tian

In this work, we propose a novel approach for detecting AI-generated images by leveraging predictive uncertainty to mitigate misuse and associated risks. The motivation arises from the fundamental assumption regarding the distributional discrepancy between natural and AI-generated images. The feasibility of distinguishing natural images from AI-generated ones is grounded in the distribution discrepancy between them. Predictive uncertainty offers an effective approach for capturing distribution shifts, thereby providing insights into detecting AI-generated images. Namely, as the distribution shift between training and testing data increases, model performance typically degrades, often accompanied by increased predictive uncertainty. Therefore, we propose to employ predictive uncertainty to reflect the discrepancies between AI-generated and natural images. In this context, the challenge lies in ensuring that the model has been trained over sufficient natural images to avoid the risk of determining the distribution of natural images as that of generated images. We propose to leverage large-scale pre-trained models to calculate the uncertainty as the score for detecting AI-generated images. This leads to a simple yet effective method for detecting AI-generated images using large-scale vision models: images that induce high uncertainty are identified as AI-generated. Comprehensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 6 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from tmlr-group/WePe. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections