Papers › Detecting clinician implicit biases in diagnoses using proximal causal inference

Detecting clinician implicit biases in diagnoses using proximal causal inference

27 Jan 2025arXiv:2501.16399archive 2025-07-28

Kara Liu, Russ Altman, Vasilis Syrgkanis

Clinical decisions to treat and diagnose patients are affected by implicit biases formed by racism, ableism, sexism, and other stereotypes. These biases reflect broader systemic discrimination in healthcare and risk marginalizing already disadvantaged groups. Existing methods for measuring implicit biases require controlled randomized testing and only capture individual attitudes rather than outcomes. However, the "big-data" revolution has led to the availability of large observational medical datasets, like EHRs and biobanks, that provide the opportunity to investigate discrepancies in patient health outcomes. In this work, we propose a causal inference approach to detect the effect of clinician implicit biases on patient outcomes in large-scale medical data. Specifically, our method uses proximal mediation to disentangle pathway-specific effects of a patient's sociodemographic attribute on a clinician's diagnosis decision. We test our method on real-world data from the UK Biobank. Our work can serve as a tool that initiates conversation and brings awareness to unequal health outcomes caused by implicit biases.

PaperPDFCode

Code

syrgkanislab/hidden_mediators officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

AttributeCausal Inference

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Causal inference

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections