Papers › Detecting and Measuring Security Implications of Entangled Domain Verification in CDN
Detecting and Measuring Security Implications of Entangled Domain Verification in CDN
Ziyu Lin, Zhiwei Lin, Run Guo, Jianjun Chen, Mingming Zhang, Ximeng Liu, Tianhao Yang, Zhuoran Cao, Robert H. Deng
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Content Delivery Networks (CDNs) offer a protection layer for enhancing the security of websites. However, a significant security flaw named Absence of Domain Verification (DVA) has become emerging recently. Although this threat is recognized, the current practices and security flaws of domain verification strategies in CDNs have not been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we present DVAHunter, an automated system for detecting DVA vulnerabilities that can lead to domain abuse in CDNs. Our evaluation of 45 major CDN providers reveals the prevalence of DVA: most (39/45) providers do not perform any verification, and even those that do remain exploitable. Additionally, we used DVAHunter to conduct a large-scale measurement of 89M subdomains from Tranco's Top 1M sites hosted on the 45 CDNs under evaluation. Our focus was on two primary DVA exploitation scenarios: covert communication and domain hijacking. We identified over 332K subdomains vulnerable to domain abuse. This tool provides deeper insights into DVA exploitation and allows us to propose viable mitigation practices for CDN providers. To date, we have received vulnerability confirmations from 12 providers; 6 (e.g., Edgio, Kuocai) have implemented fixes, and 1 (ChinaNetCenter) are actively working on solutions based on our recommendations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections