Papers › Designing Optimal Experiments: An Application to Proton Compton Scattering
Designing Optimal Experiments: An Application to Proton Compton Scattering
J. A. Melendez, R. J. Furnstahl, H. W. Griesshammer, J. A. McGovern, D. R. Phillips, M. T. Pratola
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Interpreting measurements requires a physical theory, but the theory's accuracy may vary across the experimental domain. To optimize experimental design, and so to ensure that the substantial resources necessary for modern experiments are focused on acquiring the most valuable data, both the theory uncertainty and the expected pattern of experimental errors must be considered. We develop a Bayesian approach to this problem, and apply it to the example of proton Compton scattering. Chiral Effective Field Theory (χEFT) predicts the functional form of the scattering amplitude for this reaction, so that the electromagnetic polarizabilities of the nucleon can be inferred from data. With increasing photon energy, both experimental rates and sensitivities to polarizabilities increase, but the accuracy of χEFT decreases. Our physics-based model of χEFT truncation errors is combined with present knowledge of the polarizabilities and reasonable assumptions about experimental capabilities at HIγS and MAMI to assess the information gain from measuring specific observables at specific kinematics, \emph{i.e.}, to determine the relative amount by which new data are apt to shrink uncertainties. The strongest gains would likely come from new data on the spin observables Σ₂ₓ and Σ_(2x′) at ω≃140 to 200 MeV and 40° to 120°. These would tightly constrain γ_(E1E1)-γ_(E1M2). New data on the differential cross section between 100 and 200\,MeV and over a wide angle range will substantially improve constraints on α_(E1)-β_(M1), γ_π and γ_(M1M1)-γ_(M1E2). Good signals also exist around 160 MeV for Σ₃ and Σ_(2z′). Such data will be pivotal in the continuing quest to pin down the scalar polarizabilities and refine understanding of the spin polarizabilities.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections