Papers › DER: Dynamically Expandable Representation for Class Incremental Learning
DER: Dynamically Expandable Representation for Class Incremental Learning
Shipeng Yan, Jiangwei Xie, Xuming He
We address the problem of class incremental learning, which is a core step towards achieving adaptive vision intelligence. In particular, we consider the task setting of incremental learning with limited memory and aim to achieve better stability-plasticity trade-off. To this end, we propose a novel two-stage learning approach that utilizes a dynamically expandable representation for more effective incremental concept modeling. Specifically, at each incremental step, we freeze the previously learned representation and augment it with additional feature dimensions from a new learnable feature extractor. This enables us to integrate new visual concepts with retaining learned knowledge. We dynamically expand the representation according to the complexity of novel concepts by introducing a channel-level mask-based pruning strategy. Moreover, we introduce an auxiliary loss to encourage the model to learn diverse and discriminate features for novel concepts. We conduct extensive experiments on the three class incremental learning benchmarks and our method consistently outperforms other methods with a large margin.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2103.16788")
Code
Syntology Ran 6 of 11 code samples harvested from 1 repository linked to this paper; 5 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 6 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 11 samples from 1 repository, 6 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
11 samples harvested; 6 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 5 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 11 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from Rhyssiyan/DER-ClassIL.pytorch. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
9f4e9833f2b84b8d · report
59a549e22e134aef · report
3df51f2e829fae0e · report
655d09e23b2af00d · report
3fd7e4aeb10eb4da · report
c1c1a3649ab6dc82 · report
555fea3dd6290bee · report
14b065dca3ad5ccd · report
6fa0e1315b22f977 · report
d9536cea4ed511c1 · report
60a5b69027a3fe6f · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incremental Learning | CIFAR-100 - 50 classes + 10 steps of 5 classes | DER(Standard ResNet-18) | Average Incremental Accuracy | 72.45 | #3 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | CIFAR-100 - 50 classes + 10 steps of 5 classes | DER(Modified ResNet-32) | Average Incremental Accuracy | 66.36 | #7 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | CIFAR-100 - 50 classes + 2 steps of 25 classes | DER (w/o P) | Average Incremental Accuracy | 74.61 | #3 of 4 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | CIFAR-100 - 50 classes + 5 steps of 10 classes | DER(Standard ResNet-18) | Average Incremental Accuracy | 72.60 | #3 of 15 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | CIFAR-100 - 50 classes + 5 steps of 10 classes | DER(Modified Res-32) | Average Incremental Accuracy | 67.60 | #7 of 15 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | CIFAR-100-B0(5steps of 20 classes) | DER(w/o P) | Average Incremental Accuracy | 76.80 | #4 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | CIFAR100-B0(10steps of 10 classes) | DER(ResNet-18) | Average Incremental Accuracy | 74.64 | #4 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | CIFAR100B020Step(5ClassesPerStep) | DER(ResNet-18) | Average Incremental Accuracy | 73.98 | #4 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | CIFAR100B050S(2ClassesPerStep) | DER(ResNet-18) | Average Incremental Accuracy | 72.05 | #1 of 1 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet - 10 steps | DER w/o Pruning | # M Params | 116.89 | #3 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet - 10 steps | DER w/o Pruning | Average Incremental Accuracy | 68.84 | #3 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet - 10 steps | DER w/o Pruning | Average Incremental Accuracy Top-5 | 88.17 | #3 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet - 10 steps | DER w/o Pruning | Final Accuracy | 60.16 | #3 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet - 10 steps | DER w/o Pruning | Final Accuracy Top-5 | 82.86 | #3 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet - 10 steps | DER | Average Incremental Accuracy | 66.73 | #6 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet - 10 steps | DER | Average Incremental Accuracy Top-5 | 87.08 | #6 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet - 10 steps | DER | Final Accuracy | 58.62 | #6 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet - 10 steps | DER | Final Accuracy Top-5 | 81.89 | #6 of 10 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet-100 - 50 classes + 10 steps of 5 classes | DER | Average Incremental Accuracy | 77.73 | #2 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet100 - 10 steps | DER w/o Pruning | # M Params | 112.27 | #6 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet100 - 10 steps | DER w/o Pruning | Average Incremental Accuracy | 77.18 | #6 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet100 - 10 steps | DER w/o Pruning | Average Incremental Accuracy Top-5 | 93.23 | #6 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet100 - 10 steps | DER w/o Pruning | Final Accuracy | 66.70 | #6 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet100 - 10 steps | DER w/o Pruning | Final Accuracy Top-5 | 87.52 | #6 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet100 - 10 steps | DER | Average Incremental Accuracy | 76.12 | #8 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet100 - 10 steps | DER | Average Incremental Accuracy Top-5 | 92.79 | #8 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet100 - 10 steps | DER | Final Accuracy | 66.07 | #8 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Incremental Learning | ImageNet100 - 10 steps | DER | Final Accuracy Top-5 | 88.38 | #8 of 13 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections