Papers › Dependence of fragmentation in self-gravitating accretion discs on small scale structure
Dependence of fragmentation in self-gravitating accretion discs on small scale structure
Matthew D. Young, Cathie J. Clarke
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We propose a framework for understanding the fragmentation criterion for self-gravitating discs which, in contrast to studies that emphasise the `gravoturbulent' nature of such discs, instead focuses on the properties of their quasi-regular spiral structures. Within this framework there are two evolutionary paths to fragmentation: i) collapse on the free-fall time, which requires that the ratio of cooling time to dynamical time (β) < 3 and ii) quasistatic collapse on the cooling time at a rate that is sufficiently fast that fragments are compact enough to withstand disruption when they encounter spiral features in the disc. We perform 2D grid simulations which demonstrate numerically converged fragmentation at β< 3 (in good agreement with Paardekooper et al. (2011) and others) and argue that this is a consequence of the fact that such simulations smooth the gravitational force on the scale H, the scale height of the disc. Such simulations thus only allow fragmentation via route i) above since they suppress the quasistatic contraction of fragments on scales < H; the inability of fragments to contract to significantly smaller scales then renders them susceptible to disruption at the next spiral arm encounter. On the other hand, 3D simulations indeed show fragmentation at higher β via route ii). We derive an analytic prediction of fragmentation by route ii) when β≲12, based on the requirement that fragments must contract sufficiently to withstand disruption by spiral arms. We also discuss the necessary numerical requirements on both grid based and SPH codes if they are to model fragmentation via route ii).
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections