Papers › Dense Hybrid Recurrent Multi-view Stereo Net with Dynamic Consistency Checking
Dense Hybrid Recurrent Multi-view Stereo Net with Dynamic Consistency Checking
Jian-Feng Yan, Zizhuang Wei, Hongwei Yi, Mingyu Ding, Runze Zhang, Yisong Chen, Guoping Wang, Yu-Wing Tai
In this paper, we propose an efficient and effective dense hybrid recurrent multi-view stereo net with dynamic consistency checking, namely $D^{2}$HC-RMVSNet, for accurate dense point cloud reconstruction. Our novel hybrid recurrent multi-view stereo net consists of two core modules: 1) a light DRENet (Dense Reception Expanded) module to extract dense feature maps of original size with multi-scale context information, 2) a HU-LSTM (Hybrid U-LSTM) to regularize 3D matching volume into predicted depth map, which efficiently aggregates different scale information by coupling LSTM and U-Net architecture. To further improve the accuracy and completeness of reconstructed point clouds, we leverage a dynamic consistency checking strategy instead of prefixed parameters and strategies widely adopted in existing methods for dense point cloud reconstruction. In doing so, we dynamically aggregate geometric consistency matching error among all the views. Our method ranks \textbf{1ˢᵗ} on the complex outdoor \textsl{Tanks and Temples} benchmark over all the methods. Extensive experiments on the in-door DTU dataset show our method exhibits competitive performance to the state-of-the-art method while dramatically reduces memory consumption, which costs only 19.4% of R-MVSNet memory consumption. The codebase is available at \hyperlink{https://github.com/yhw-yhw/D2HC-RMVSNet}{https://github.com/yhw-yhw/D2HC-RMVSNet}.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="2007.10872")
Code
Syntology Ran 7 of 33 code samples harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper; 26 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 1 ran · honoured contract; 2 ran · our draft was wrong; 4 ran with no contract checked.
By repository: official repository: 15 samples from 1 repository, 4 ran; community (archive-listed): 18 samples from 1 repository, 3 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
33 samples harvested; 7 ran; 1 honoured the contract we drafted; 26 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 0 of the 33 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 2 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
e23d1383c35bf5b7 · report
a76fc7fb6958f97c · report
b62bec09ceeaca79 · report
a1db096963f65ed2 · report
57f8bde36807b129 · report
ebeb960f39a49a1f · report
6b612d536ecaad39 · report
97a56271be444a38 · report
31cdec41e4c82500 · report
8c215efdfa14a940 · report
50fac0e8112069d0 · report
9c2943933ea1a82e · report
681f7cd39c206d61 · report
5dc8398ed1ff8701 · report
c84727567da9be2b · report
0bf4b207ce0d106a · report
8a38e306ff4c5b42 · report
56858e04e6fdb2ff · report
c41b40eafbf6e881 · report
fb6a94f3be766ec1 · report
8542218e64194c0f · report
dc432dc54a530ceb · report
ed08fe74ba4859e3 · report
39256ffa5e435bee · report
fea0b2409287c761 · report
664f1649e11743ea · report
21691dc956884a92 · report
6f4c635649523f09 · report
6830d06d246cc3e7 · report
5c36c6f46f8628bd · report
3d90b05b13b0c0b9 · report
f6147a9b9d73ca5e · report
234f6f5aa22f6f5c · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections