Papers › Demystifying Random Number in Ethereum Smart Contract: Taxonomy, Vulnerability...
Demystifying Random Number in Ethereum Smart Contract: Taxonomy, Vulnerability Identification, and Attack Detection
Peng Qian, Jianting He, Lingling Lu, Siwei Wu, Zhipeng Lu, Lei Wu, Yajin Zhou, Qinming He
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
Recent years have witnessed explosive growth in blockchain smart contract applications. As smart contracts become increasingly popular and carry trillion dollars worth of digital assets, they become more of an appealing target for attackers, who have exploited vulnerabilities in smart contracts to cause catastrophic economic losses. Notwithstanding a proliferation of work that has been developed to detect an impressive list of vulnerabilities, the bad randomness vulnerability is overlooked by many existing tools. In this paper, we make the first attempt to provide a systematic analysis of random numbers in Ethereum smart contracts, by investigating the principles behind pseudo-random number generation and organizing them into a taxonomy. We also lucubrate various attacks against bad random numbers and group them into four categories. Furthermore, we present RNVulDet - a tool that incorporates taint analysis techniques to automatically identify bad randomness vulnerabilities and detect corresponding attack transactions. To extensively verify the effectiveness of RNVulDet, we construct three new datasets: i) 34 well-known contracts that are reported to possess bad randomness vulnerabilities, ii) 214 popular contracts that have been rigorously audited before launch and are regarded as free of bad randomness vulnerabilities, and iii) a dataset consisting of 47,668 smart contracts and 49,951 suspicious transactions. We compare RNVulDet with three state-of-the-art smart contract vulnerability detectors, and our tool significantly outperforms them. Meanwhile, RNVulDet spends 2.98s per contract on average, in most cases orders-of-magnitude faster than other tools. RNVulDet successfully reveals 44,264 attack transactions. Our implementation and datasets are released, hoping to inspire others.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections