Papers › Deep Speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognition
Deep Speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognition
Awni Hannun, Carl Case, Jared Casper, Bryan Catanzaro, Greg Diamos, Erich Elsen, Ryan Prenger, Sanjeev Satheesh, Shubho Sengupta, Adam Coates, Andrew Y. Ng
We present a state-of-the-art speech recognition system developed using end-to-end deep learning. Our architecture is significantly simpler than traditional speech systems, which rely on laboriously engineered processing pipelines; these traditional systems also tend to perform poorly when used in noisy environments. In contrast, our system does not need hand-designed components to model background noise, reverberation, or speaker variation, but instead directly learns a function that is robust to such effects. We do not need a phoneme dictionary, nor even the concept of a "phoneme." Key to our approach is a well-optimized RNN training system that uses multiple GPUs, as well as a set of novel data synthesis techniques that allow us to efficiently obtain a large amount of varied data for training. Our system, called Deep Speech, outperforms previously published results on the widely studied Switchboard Hub5'00, achieving 16.0% error on the full test set. Deep Speech also handles challenging noisy environments better than widely used, state-of-the-art commercial speech systems.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
For agents, Syntology's MCP tool lists every function and class Syntology harvested from this paper and whether it ran (how to connect): get_harvested_code_for_paper(arxiv_id="1412.5567")
Code
Syntology Ran 9 of 9 code samples harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper; 0 have no recorded run. Of those that ran: 2 ran · honoured contract; 5 ran · our draft was wrong; 2 ran · fixture could not drive it.
By repository: community (archive-listed): 9 samples from 3 repositories, 9 ran. The run record, sample by sample. “Ran” means executed on a synthesized input, not that the code is correct or reproduces the paper.
24 repositories listed; official and paper-mentioned ones first.
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
9 samples harvested; 9 ran; 2 honoured the contract we drafted; 0 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.
Licence: 8 of the 9 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.
Harvested from 3 repositories linked to this paper, official or community; each sample names its own and says which. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.
Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.
Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.
51944d6733966676 · report
1cb244d6be841554 · report
50176dcc6ddee70e · report
7c01db5a56271dd6 · report
232015401802af14 · report
a7e204ec063f026b · report
3306aa443c436614 · report
fb9b291fc581e945 · report
970f4ac6b4021aaf · report
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accented Speech Recognition | VoxForge American-Canadian | Deep Speech | Percentage error | 15.01 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Accented Speech Recognition | VoxForge Commonwealth | Deep Speech | Percentage error | 28.46 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Accented Speech Recognition | VoxForge European | Deep Speech | Percentage error | 31.20 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Accented Speech Recognition | VoxForge Indian | Deep Speech | Percentage error | 45.35 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Noisy Speech Recognition | CHiME clean | CNN + Bi-RNN + CTC (speech to letters) | Percentage error | 6.3 | #2 of 2 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Noisy Speech Recognition | CHiME real | CNN + Bi-RNN + CTC (speech to letters) | Percentage error | 67.94 | #5 of 5 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | Switchboard + Hub500 | Deep Speech + FSH | Percentage error | 12.6 | #20 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | Switchboard + Hub500 | CNN + Bi-RNN + CTC (speech to letters), 25.9% WER if trainedonlyon SWB | Percentage error | 12.6 | #21 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | Switchboard + Hub500 | Deep Speech | Percentage error | 20 | #30 of 30 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Speech Recognition | swb_hub_500 WER fullSWBCH | CNN + Bi-RNN + CTC (speech to letters), 25.9% WER if trainedonlyon SWB | Percentage error | 16 | #8 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections