Papers › Deep Optics for Monocular Depth Estimation and 3D Object Detection
Deep Optics for Monocular Depth Estimation and 3D Object Detection
Julie Chang, Gordon Wetzstein
Depth estimation and 3D object detection are critical for scene understanding but remain challenging to perform with a single image due to the loss of 3D information during image capture. Recent models using deep neural networks have improved monocular depth estimation performance, but there is still difficulty in predicting absolute depth and generalizing outside a standard dataset. Here we introduce the paradigm of deep optics, i.e. end-to-end design of optics and image processing, to the monocular depth estimation problem, using coded defocus blur as an additional depth cue to be decoded by a neural network. We evaluate several optical coding strategies along with an end-to-end optimization scheme for depth estimation on three datasets, including NYU Depth v2 and KITTI. We find an optimized freeform lens design yields the best results, but chromatic aberration from a singlet lens offers significantly improved performance as well. We build a physical prototype and validate that chromatic aberrations improve depth estimation on real-world results. In addition, we train object detection networks on the KITTI dataset and show that the lens optimized for depth estimation also results in improved 3D object detection performance.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depth Estimation | NYU-Depth V2 | Optimized, freeform | RMS | 0.4325 | #11 of 17 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Depth Estimation | NYU-Depth V2 | Freeform | RMS | 0.433 | #12 of 17 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections