Papers › Deep Neural Networks With Region-Based Pooling Structures for Mammographic Image Classification
Deep Neural Networks With Region-Based Pooling Structures for Mammographic Image Classification
Xin Shu; Lei Zhang; Zizhou Wang; Qing Lv; Zhang Yi
Breast cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed solid cancers. Mammography is the most commonly used screening technology for detecting breast cancer. Traditional machine learning methods of mammographic image classification or segmentation using manual features require a great quantity of manual segmentation annotation data to train the model and test the results. But manual labeling is expensive, time-consuming, and laborious, and greatly increases the cost of system construction. To reduce this cost and the workload of radiologists, an end-to-end full-image mammogram classification method based on deep neural networks was proposed for classifier building, which can be constructed without bounding boxes or mask ground truth label of training data. The only label required in this method is the classification of mammographic images, which can be relatively easy to collect from diagnostic reports. Because breast lesions usually take up a fraction of the total area visualized in the mammographic image, we propose different pooling structures for convolutional neural networks(CNNs) instead of the common pooling methods, which divide the image into regions and select the few with high probability of malignancy as the representation of the whole mammographic image. The proposed pooling structures can be applied on most CNN-based models, which may greatly improve the models' performance on mammographic image data with the same input. Experimental results on the publicly available INbreast dataset and CBIS dataset indicate that the proposed pooling structures perform satisfactorily on mammographic image data compared with previous state-of-the-art mammographic image classifiers and detection algorithm using segmentation annotations.
Code
No code repository is listed for this paper in the archive or in Syntology's graph.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspicous (BIRADS 4,5)-no suspicous (BIRADS 1,2,3) per image classification | InBreast | RGP DenseNet-169 | AUC | 0.934 | #2 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Suspicous (BIRADS 4,5)-no suspicous (BIRADS 1,2,3) per image classification | InBreast | GGP DenseNet-169 | AUC | 0.922 | #6 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Suspicous (BIRADS 4,5)-no suspicous (BIRADS 1,2,3) per image classification | InBreast | Avg pooling DenseNet-169 | AUC | 0.862 | #11 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Suspicous (BIRADS 4,5)-no suspicous (BIRADS 1,2,3) per image classification | InBreast | Max pooling DenseNet-169 | AUC | 0.837 | #13 of 16 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections