Papers › Deep Multi-View Stereo gone wild

Deep Multi-View Stereo gone wild

30 Apr 2021arXiv:2104.15119archive 2025-07-28

François Darmon, Bénédicte Bascle, Jean-Clément Devaux, Pascal Monasse, Mathieu Aubry

Deep multi-view stereo (MVS) methods have been developed and extensively compared on simple datasets, where they now outperform classical approaches. In this paper, we ask whether the conclusions reached in controlled scenarios are still valid when working with Internet photo collections. We propose a methodology for evaluation and explore the influence of three aspects of deep MVS methods: network architecture, training data, and supervision. We make several key observations, which we extensively validate quantitatively and qualitatively, both for depth prediction and complete 3D reconstructions. First, complex unsupervised approaches cannot train on data in the wild. Our new approach makes it possible with three key elements: upsampling the output, softmin based aggregation and a single reconstruction loss. Second, supervised deep depthmap-based MVS methods are state-of-the art for reconstruction of few internet images. Finally, our evaluation provides very different results than usual ones. This shows that evaluation in uncontrolled scenarios is important for new architectures.

PaperPDFCode

In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.

Code

fdarmon/wild_deep_mvs officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHubpytorch report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Depth EstimationDepth Prediction

1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections