Papers › Deep Learning-based Non-Intrusive Multi-Objective Speech Assessment Model with...

Deep Learning-based Non-Intrusive Multi-Objective Speech Assessment Model with Cross-Domain Features

3 Nov 2021arXiv:2111.02363archive 2025-07-28

Ryandhimas E. Zezario, Szu-Wei Fu, Fei Chen, Chiou-Shann Fuh, Hsin-Min Wang, Yu Tsao

In this study, we propose a cross-domain multi-objective speech assessment model called MOSA-Net, which can estimate multiple speech assessment metrics simultaneously. Experimental results show that MOSA-Net can improve the linear correlation coefficient (LCC) by 0.026 (0.990 vs 0.964 in seen noise environments) and 0.012 (0.969 vs 0.957 in unseen noise environments) in perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ) prediction, compared to Quality-Net, an existing single-task model for PESQ prediction, and improve LCC by 0.021 (0.985 vs 0.964 in seen noise environments) and 0.047 (0.836 vs 0.789 in unseen noise environments) in short-time objective intelligibility (STOI) prediction, compared to STOI-Net (based on CRNN), an existing single-task model for STOI prediction. Moreover, MOSA-Net, originally trained to assess objective scores, can be used as a pre-trained model to be effectively adapted to an assessment model for predicting subjective quality and intelligibility scores with a limited amount of training data. Experimental results show that MOSA-Net can improve LCC by 0.018 (0.805 vs 0.787) in mean opinion score (MOS) prediction, compared to MOS-SSL, a strong single-task model for MOS prediction. In light of the confirmed prediction capability, we further adopt the latent representations of MOSA-Net to guide the speech enhancement (SE) process and derive a quality-intelligibility (QI)-aware SE (QIA-SE) approach accordingly. Experimental results show that QIA-SE provides superior enhancement performance compared with the baseline SE system in terms of objective evaluation metrics and qualitative evaluation test. For example, QIA-SE can improve PESQ by 0.301 (2.953 vs 2.652 in seen noise environments) and 0.18 (2.658 vs 2.478 in unseen noise environments) over a CNN-based baseline SE model.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

4 samples harvested; 0 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 4 have no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 0 of the 4 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from dhimasryan/MOSA-Net-Cross-Domain. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections