Papers › Deep Learning-based Image Super-Resolution Considering Quantitative and Perceptual Quality

Deep Learning-based Image Super-Resolution Considering Quantitative and Perceptual Quality

13 Sep 2018arXiv:1809.04789archive 2025-07-28

Jun-Ho Choi, Jun-Hyuk Kim, Manri Cheon, Jong-Seok Lee

Recently, it has been shown that in super-resolution, there exists a tradeoff relationship between the quantitative and perceptual quality of super-resolved images, which correspond to the similarity to the ground-truth images and the naturalness, respectively. In this paper, we propose a novel super-resolution method that can improve the perceptual quality of the upscaled images while preserving the conventional quantitative performance. The proposed method employs a deep network for multi-pass upscaling in company with a discriminator network and two quantitative score predictor networks. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves a good balance of the quantitative and perceptual quality, showing more satisfactory results than existing methods.

PaperPDFCode

Code

idearibosome/tf-perceptual-eusr mentioned on GitHubtfApache-2.0 report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Image Super-ResolutionSuper-Resolution

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Image Super-Resolution BSD100 - 4x upscaling 4PP-EUSR PSNR 26.5707 #57 of 71 Archive leaderboard report
Image Super-Resolution BSD100 - 4x upscaling 4PP-EUSR SSIM 0.6900 #57 of 71 Archive leaderboard report
Image Super-Resolution Set14 - 4x upscaling 4PP-EUSR PSNR 27.6222 #90 of 104 Archive leaderboard report
Image Super-Resolution Set14 - 4x upscaling 4PP-EUSR SSIM 0.7419 #90 of 104 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections