Papers › Deep generative models in inversion: a review and development of a new approach based...
Deep generative models in inversion: a review and development of a new approach based on a variational autoencoder
Jorge Lopez-Alvis, Eric Laloy, Frédéric Nguyen, Thomas Hermans
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
When solving inverse problems in geophysical imaging, deep generative models (DGMs) may be used to enforce the solution to display highly structured spatial patterns which are supported by independent information (e.g. the geological setting) of the subsurface. In such case, inversion may be formulated in a latent space where a low-dimensional parameterization of the patterns is defined and where Markov chain Monte Carlo or gradient-based methods may be applied. However, the generative mapping between the latent and the original (pixel) representations is usually highly nonlinear which may cause some difficulties for inversion, especially for gradient-based methods. In this contribution we review the conceptual framework of inversion with DGMs and study the principal causes of the nonlinearity of the generative mapping. As a result, we identify a conflict between two goals: the accuracy of the generated patterns and the feasibility of gradient-based inversion. In addition, we show how some of the training parameters of a variational autoencoder, which is a particular instance of a DGM, may be chosen so that a tradeoff between these two goals is achieved and acceptable inversion results are obtained with a stochastic gradient-descent scheme. A test case using truth models with channel patterns of different complexity and cross-borehole traveltime tomographic data involving both a linear and a nonlinear forward operator is used to assess the performance of the proposed approach.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections