Papers › Deep Diacritization: Efficient Hierarchical Recurrence for Improved Arabic Diacritization
Deep Diacritization: Efficient Hierarchical Recurrence for Improved Arabic Diacritization
Badr AlKhamissi, Muhammad N. ElNokrashy, Mohamed Gabr
We propose a novel architecture for labelling character sequences that achieves state-of-the-art results on the Tashkeela Arabic diacritization benchmark. The core is a two-level recurrence hierarchy that operates on the word and character levels separately---enabling faster training and inference than comparable traditional models. A cross-level attention module further connects the two, and opens the door for network interpretability. The task module is a softmax classifier that enumerates valid combinations of diacritics. This architecture can be extended with a recurrent decoder that optionally accepts priors from partially diacritized text, which improves results. We employ extra tricks such as sentence dropout and majority voting to further boost the final result. Our best model achieves a WER of 5.34%, outperforming the previous state-of-the-art with a 30.56% relative error reduction.
In Syntology Open this paper in Syntology's Atlas, the map of the papers in Syntology's graph and their citations.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
1 archive task tag without a task page not shown.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arabic Text Diacritization | CATT | Deep Diacritization (D2) | DER(%) | 13.310 | #6 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Arabic Text Diacritization | CATT | Deep Diacritization (D2) | WER (%) | 49.417 | #6 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Arabic Text Diacritization | CATT | Deep Diacritization (D3) | DER(%) | 58.313 | #12 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Arabic Text Diacritization | CATT | Deep Diacritization (D3) | WER (%) | 98.710 | #12 of 12 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Arabic Text Diacritization | Tashkeela | D3 (D2 + decoder) | Diacritic Error Rate | 0.0183 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Arabic Text Diacritization | Tashkeela | D3 (D2 + decoder) | Word Error Rate (WER) | 0.0534 | #3 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Arabic Text Diacritization | Tashkeela | D2 | Diacritic Error Rate | 0.0185 | #4 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
| Arabic Text Diacritization | Tashkeela | D2 | Word Error Rate (WER) | 0.0553 | #4 of 6 | Archive leaderboard | report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections