Papers › Deep Defocus Map Estimation Using Domain Adaptation

Deep Defocus Map Estimation Using Domain Adaptation

1 Jun 2019CVPR 2019 6archive 2025-07-28

Junyong Lee, Sungkil Lee, Sunghyun Cho, Seungyong Lee

In this paper, we propose the first end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, Defocus Map Estimation Network (DMENet), for spatially varying defocus map estimation. To train the network, we produce a novel depth-of-field (DOF) dataset, SYNDOF, where each image is synthetically blurred with a ground-truth depth map. Due to the synthetic nature of SYNDOF, the feature characteristics of images in SYNDOF can differ from those of real defocused photos. To address this gap, we use domain adaptation that transfers the features of real defocused photos into those of synthetically blurred ones. Our DMENet consists of four subnetworks: blur estimation, domain adaptation, content preservation, and sharpness calibration networks. The subnetworks are connected to each other and jointly trained with their corresponding supervisions in an end-to-end manner. Our method is evaluated on publicly available blur detection and blur estimation datasets and the results show the state-of-the-art performance.In this paper, we propose the first end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, Defocus Map Estimation Network (DMENet), for spatially varying defocus map estimation. To train the network, we produce a novel depth-of-field (DOF) dataset, SYNDOF, where each image is synthetically blurred with a ground-truth depth map. Due to the synthetic nature of SYNDOF, the feature characteristics of images in SYNDOF can differ from those of real defocused photos. To address this gap, we use domain adaptation that transfers the features of real defocused photos into those of synthetically blurred ones. Our DMENet consists of four subnetworks: blur estimation, domain adaptation, content preservation, and sharpness calibration networks. The subnetworks are connected to each other and jointly trained with their corresponding supervisions in an end-to-end manner. Our method is evaluated on publicly available blur detection and blur estimation datasets and the results show the state-of-the-art performance.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

DeblurringDefocus EstimationDomain Adaptation

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

TaskDatasetModelMetricValueRank at snapshotLeaderboardReport
Defocus Estimation CUHK - Blur Detection Dataset DMENet (BDCS) Blur Segmentation Accuracy 87.35 #1 of 5 Archive leaderboard report

Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections