Papers › Deconfounding Imitation Learning with Variational Inference

Deconfounding Imitation Learning with Variational Inference

4 Nov 2022arXiv:2211.02667archive 2025-07-28

Risto Vuorio, Pim de Haan, Johann Brehmer, Hanno Ackermann, Daniel Dijkman, Taco Cohen

Standard imitation learning can fail when the expert demonstrators have different sensory inputs than the imitating agent. This is because partial observability gives rise to hidden confounders in the causal graph. In previous work, to work around the confounding problem, policies have been trained using query access to the expert's policy or inverse reinforcement learning (IRL). However, both approaches have drawbacks as the expert's policy may not be available and IRL can be unstable in practice. Instead, we propose to train a variational inference model to infer the expert's latent information and use it to train a latent-conditional policy. We prove that using this method, under strong assumptions, the identification of the correct imitation learning policy is theoretically possible from expert demonstrations alone. In practice, we focus on a setting with less strong assumptions where we use exploration data for learning the inference model. We show in theory and practice that this algorithm converges to the correct interventional policy, solves the confounding issue, and can under certain assumptions achieve an asymptotically optimal imitation performance.

PaperPDFCode

Code

vuoristo/deconfounding officialmentioned in paper report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Tasks

Imitation LearningVariational Inference

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Methods

Testfail

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections