Papers › Deceptive Game Design? Investigating the Impact of Visual Card Style on Player Perception

Deceptive Game Design? Investigating the Impact of Visual Card Style on Player Perception

23 Jun 2025arXiv:2506.18648links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Leonie Kallabis, Timo Bertram, Florian Rupp

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

The visual style of game elements considerably contributes to the overall experience. Aesthetics influence player appeal, while the abilities of game pieces define their in-game functionality. In this paper, we investigate how the visual style of collectible cards influences the players' perception of the card's actual strength in the game. Using the popular trading card game Magic: The Gathering, we conduct a single-blind survey study that examines how players perceive the strength of AI-generated cards that are shown in two contrasting visual styles: cute and harmless, or heroic and mighty. Our analysis reveals that some participants are influenced by a card's visual appearance when judging its in-game strength. Overall, differences in style perception are normally distributed around a neutral center, but individual participants vary in both directions: some generally perceive the cute style to be stronger, whereas others believe that the heroic style is better.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections