Papers › Decalf: A Directed, Effectful Cost-Aware Logical Framework
Decalf: A Directed, Effectful Cost-Aware Logical Framework
Harrison Grodin, Yue Niu, Jonathan Sterling, Robert Harper
The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.
We present Decalf, a directed, effectful cost-aware logical framework for studying quantitative aspects of functional programs with effects. Like Calf, the language is based on an internal phase distinction between the behavior of a program and its cost measured by an effect. Decalf extends Calf by accommodating other effects, such as probabilistic choice, which requires a reformulation of Calf's approach to cost analysis: rather than rely on a separable notion of cost, here a cost bound is simply another program. Formally, every type is equipped with an intrinsic preorder, allowing effectful programs to be compared for cost inequality. This approach serves as a streamlined alternative to the standard method of isolating a cost recurrence and readily extends to higher-order, effectful programs. The development proceeds by first introducing the Decalf type system, which is based on an intrinsic cost ordering among terms that restricts in the behavioral phase to extensional equality. This formulation is then applied to illustrative examples, including pure and effectful sorting algorithms. Finally, Decalf is semantically justified via a model in the topos of augmented simplicial sets.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections