Papers › DeCafNet: Delegate and Conquer for Efficient Temporal Grounding in Long Videos
DeCafNet: Delegate and Conquer for Efficient Temporal Grounding in Long Videos
22 May 2025CVPR 2025 1arXiv:2505.16376archive 2025-07-28
Zijia Lu, A S M Iftekhar, Gaurav Mittal, Tianjian Meng, Xiawei Wang, Cheng Zhao, Rohith Kukkala, Ehsan Elhamifar, Mei Chen
Long Video Temporal Grounding (LVTG) aims at identifying specific moments within lengthy videos based on user-provided text queries for effective content retrieval. The approach taken by existing methods of dividing video into clips and processing each clip via a full-scale expert encoder is challenging to scale due to prohibitive computational costs of processing a large number of clips in long videos. To address this issue, we introduce DeCafNet, an approach employing ``delegate-and-conquer'' strategy to achieve computation efficiency without sacrificing grounding performance. DeCafNet introduces a sidekick encoder that performs dense feature extraction over all video clips in a resource-efficient manner, while generating a saliency map to identify the most relevant clips for full processing by the expert encoder. To effectively leverage features from sidekick and expert encoders that exist at different temporal resolutions, we introduce DeCaf-Grounder, which unifies and refines them via query-aware temporal aggregation and multi-scale temporal refinement for accurate grounding. Experiments on two LTVG benchmark datasets demonstrate that DeCafNet reduces computation by up to 47\% while still outperforming existing methods, establishing a new state-of-the-art for LTVG in terms of both efficiency and performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/ZijiaLewisLu/CVPR2025-DeCafNet.
Code
Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.
Code Syntology ran Syntology
Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.
Tasks
Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28
| Task | Dataset | Model | Metric | Value | Rank at snapshot | Leaderboard | Report |
| Natural Language Moment Retrieval |
MAD |
DeCafNet |
R@1,IoU=0.1 |
13.25 |
#2 of 8 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Moment Retrieval |
MAD |
DeCafNet |
R@1,IoU=0.3 |
10.96 |
#2 of 8 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Moment Retrieval |
MAD |
DeCafNet |
R@1,IoU=0.5 |
7.06 |
#2 of 8 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Moment Retrieval |
MAD |
DeCafNet |
R@5,IoU=0.1 |
27.73 |
#2 of 8 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Moment Retrieval |
MAD |
DeCafNet |
R@5,IoU=0.3 |
23.68 |
#2 of 8 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Moment Retrieval |
MAD |
DeCafNet |
R@5,IoU=0.5 |
16.13 |
#2 of 8 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Moment Retrieval |
TACoS |
DeCafNet |
R@1,IoU=0.3 |
57.36 |
#3 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Moment Retrieval |
TACoS |
DeCafNet |
R@1,IoU=0.5 |
46.79 |
#3 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Moment Retrieval |
TACoS |
DeCafNet |
R@5,IoU=0.1 |
81.05 |
#3 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Moment Retrieval |
TACoS |
DeCafNet |
R@5,IoU=0.3 |
71.13 |
#3 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-100% |
R@1 IoU=0.3 |
22.21 |
#2 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-100% |
R@1 IoU=0.5 |
15.52 |
#2 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-100% |
R@1 Mean(0.3 and 0.5) |
18.86 |
#2 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-100% |
R@5 IoU=0.3 |
45.63 |
#2 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-100% |
R@5 IoU=0.5 |
33.93 |
#2 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-50% |
R@1 IoU=0.3 |
20.81 |
#3 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-50% |
R@1 IoU=0.5 |
15.04 |
#3 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-50% |
R@1 Mean(0.3 and 0.5) |
17.93 |
#3 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-50% |
R@5 IoU=0.3 |
42.40 |
#3 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-50% |
R@5 IoU=0.5 |
31.68 |
#3 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-50% (no NaQ) |
R@1 IoU=0.3 |
18.10 |
#5 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-50% (no NaQ) |
R@1 IoU=0.5 |
12.55 |
#5 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-50% (no NaQ) |
R@1 Mean(0.3 and 0.5) |
15.32 |
#5 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-50% (no NaQ) |
R@5 IoU=0.3 |
38.85 |
#5 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Natural Language Queries |
Ego4D |
DeCafNet-50% (no NaQ) |
R@5 IoU=0.5 |
28.27 |
#5 of 10 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Temporal Sentence Grounding |
Charades-STA |
DeCafNet |
R1@0.5 |
68.79 |
#1 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Temporal Sentence Grounding |
Charades-STA |
DeCafNet |
R1@0.7 |
47.55 |
#1 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Temporal Sentence Grounding |
Charades-STA |
DeCafNet |
R5@0.5 |
91.53 |
#1 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Temporal Sentence Grounding |
Charades-STA |
DeCafNet |
R5@0.7 |
72.96 |
#1 of 13 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Temporal Sentence Grounding |
Ego4D-Goalstep |
DeCafNet-100% |
R@1,IoU=0.3 |
23.20 |
#1 of 3 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Temporal Sentence Grounding |
Ego4D-Goalstep |
DeCafNet-100% |
R@1,IoU=0.5 |
19.40 |
#1 of 3 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Temporal Sentence Grounding |
Ego4D-Goalstep |
DeCafNet-100% |
R@5,IoU=0.3 |
51.38 |
#1 of 3 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Temporal Sentence Grounding |
Ego4D-Goalstep |
DeCafNet-100% |
R@5,IoU=0.5 |
44.17 |
#1 of 3 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Temporal Sentence Grounding |
Ego4D-Goalstep |
DeCafNet-50% |
R@1,IoU=0.3 |
21.29 |
#2 of 3 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Temporal Sentence Grounding |
Ego4D-Goalstep |
DeCafNet-50% |
R@1,IoU=0.5 |
17.46 |
#2 of 3 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Temporal Sentence Grounding |
Ego4D-Goalstep |
DeCafNet-50% |
R@5,IoU=0.3 |
47.27 |
#2 of 3 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Temporal Sentence Grounding |
Ego4D-Goalstep |
DeCafNet-50% |
R@5,IoU=0.5 |
40.40 |
#2 of 3 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Grounding |
MAD |
DeCafNet |
R@1,IoU=0.1 |
13.25 |
#1 of 2 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Grounding |
MAD |
DeCafNet |
R@1,IoU=0.3 |
10.96 |
#1 of 2 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Grounding |
MAD |
DeCafNet |
R@5,IoU=0.1 |
27.73 |
#1 of 2 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
| Video Grounding |
MAD |
DeCafNet |
R@5,IoU=0.3 |
23.68 |
#1 of 2 |
Archive leaderboard |
report |
Ranks are positions in the archive's leaderboards as they stood at the 2025-07-28 snapshot. Results published since then are not among these rows, so a rank here is not a current standing.
Methods
Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections