Papers › Danish National Election 2022 Twitter Data on Likes, Retweets, and Botscores for the...

Danish National Election 2022 Twitter Data on Likes, Retweets, and Botscores for the Purpose of Exploring Coordinated Inauthenthic Behavior

15 May 2023arXiv:2305.08621links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Laura Jahn, Rasmus K. Rendsvig

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

This note describes code and experiments related to a Twitter dataset on the Danish National Election 2022, available at Harvard Dataverse (doi.org/10.7910/DVN/RWPZUN). We cluster Twitter users into bins of users that showed exactly the same liking/retweeting behavior over a month-long period during which the Danish National Election took place. To investigate whether any of these bins exhibited coordinated inauthentic behavior, we were interested in whether bin size correlated with user account deletions/suspensions and/or high bot scores from Botometer / Botometer Lite. We did not find significant correlations (also neither between Botometer and Botometer Lite scores). This note primarily contains the README.md from the GitHub repository LJ-9/Danish-Election-2022-Twitter-Likes-Retweets-Botscores-Inauthentic-Coordinated-Behavior of the same name, with a few additional comments and references. We upload the note for visibility, hoping that other researchers may find the data of use.

PaperPDFCode

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections