Papers › CVPT: Cross-Attention help Visual Prompt Tuning adapt visual task

CVPT: Cross-Attention help Visual Prompt Tuning adapt visual task

27 Aug 2024arXiv:2408.14961archive 2025-07-28

Lingyun Huang, Jianxu Mao, Yaonan Wang, Junfei Yi, Ziming Tao

In recent years, the rapid expansion of model sizes has led to large-scale pre-trained models demonstrating remarkable capabilities. Consequently, there has been a trend towards increasing the scale of models. However, this trend introduces significant challenges, including substantial computational costs of training and transfer to downstream tasks. To address these issues, Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) methods have been introduced. These methods optimize large-scale pre-trained models for specific tasks by fine-tuning a select group of parameters. Among these PEFT methods, adapter-based and prompt-based methods are the primary techniques. Specifically, in the field of visual fine-tuning, adapters gain prominence over prompts because of the latter's relatively weaker performance and efficiency. Under the circumstances, we refine the widely-used Visual Prompt Tuning (VPT) method, proposing Cross Visual Prompt Tuning (CVPT). CVPT calculates cross-attention between the prompt tokens and the embedded tokens, which allows us to compute the semantic relationship between them and conduct the fine-tuning of models exactly to adapt visual tasks better. Furthermore, we introduce the weight-sharing mechanism to initialize the parameters of cross-attention, which avoids massive learnable parameters from cross-attention and enhances the representative capability of cross-attention. We conduct comprehensive testing across 25 datasets and the result indicates that CVPT significantly improves VPT's performance and efficiency in visual tasks. For example, on the VTAB-1K benchmark, CVPT outperforms VPT over 4% in average accuracy, rivaling the advanced adapter-based methods in performance and efficiency. Our experiments confirm that prompt-based methods can achieve exceptional results in visual fine-tuning.

Code

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

6 samples harvested; 5 ran; 0 honoured the contract we drafted; 1 has no recorded run. Read from Syntology's graph 2026-09-24; that is when this build read the record, not when the samples ran.

Licence: 6 of the 6 samples are pointer only, meaning Syntology does not serve that copy's text. This page shows no code text for any sample; each one links to its file in the repository.

Harvested from xlgsyzp/cvpt. “Ran” means the sample executed on a synthesized input. It does not mean the output is correct, and nothing here reproduces the paper's results. “Honoured” and “violated” refer to a contract Syntology drafted from the code itself; “our draft was wrong” and “fixture could not drive it” are failures of Syntology's instrument, not of the code.

Each sample ends with its code_sha256, Syntology's identity for that exact code. An agent fetches the stored sample with Syntology's MCP tool get_code(code_sha256="…") (how to connect); click an identity to copy that call.

Repository labels, per sample. official repository: The archive marks this repository official for the paper. named in the paper: The archive records that the paper mentions this repository; it is not marked official. community (archive-listed): In the archive's code links for this paper, not marked official and not recorded as mentioned in the paper. found in paper text by Syntology: Syntology found this repository in the paper's own text; whether it is the authors' implementation is not asserted. community: Not in the archive's code links for this paper; a community repository Syntology harvested. Samples from a repository marked official are listed first. Licence labels name the repository's licence as recorded at harvest. “Pointer only” means Syntology does not serve that copy's text, for one of four reasons: no licence file was found; the licence was not identified; the licence is recorded as permissive but that copy's record is not marked cleared; or the licence is outside the permissive list Syntology serves text under (MIT, Apache-2.0, BSD and similar). Some licences outside that list permit redistribution, such as WTFPL, and GPL-3.0 under its conditions; they are simply not on the list. Hover a licence label for the reason. File links open the file on GitHub at the default branch, which may have changed since the harvest.

Tasks

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections