Papers › Cutting the Double Loop: Theory and Algorithms for Reliability-Based Design...

Cutting the Double Loop: Theory and Algorithms for Reliability-Based Design Optimization with Statistical Uncertainty

31 May 2018arXiv:1806.00048links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Zachary del Rosario, Richard W. Fenrich, Gianluca Iaccarino

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

Statistical uncertainties complicate engineering design -- confounding regulated design approaches, and degrading the performance of reliability efforts. The simplest means to tackle this uncertainty is double loop simulation; a nested Monte Carlo method that, for practical problems, is intractable. In this work, we introduce a flexible, general approximation technique that obviates the double loop. This approximation is constructed in the context of a novel theory of reliability design under statistical uncertainty: We introduce metrics for measuring the efficacy of RBDO strategies (effective margin and effective reliability), minimal conditions for controlling uncertain reliability (precision margin), and stricter conditions that guarantee the desired reliability at a designed confidence level. We provide a number of examples with open-source code to demonstrate our approaches in a reproducible fashion.

PaperPDFCode

Code

zdelrosario/bv-questionable officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections