Papers › Why Charge Added Using Transition Metals To Some Insulators -- Including LK-99 --...

Why Charge Added Using Transition Metals To Some Insulators -- Including LK-99 -- Localizes and Does Not Yield a Metal

14 Aug 2023arXiv:2308.07295links table onlyarchive 2025-07-28

Alexandru B. Georgescu

The archive published only this paper's code-link row. Authors, date and abstract are from arXiv's metadata (CC0), read from the Kaggle arXiv metadata snapshot of 2026-09-12 where its title matched the archive's; the title is the archive's.

While adding charge to semiconductors via dopants is a well-established method for tuning electronic properties, we demonstrate that introducing transition metal impurities into certain insulators can lead to localized charge, assisted by a Jahn-Teller distortion. This leads to isolated charge, and an insulating material as opposed to emergent states - including superconductivity. We focus on Cu impurities added to Pb₁₀(PO₄)₆O ('LK-99'), replacing 10% of Cu ions, as discussed in recent literature. Our calculations show that the material remains a wide bandgap insulator with isolated, S=1/2 localized charges on the Cu ions-similar to color centers-even within standard DFT, without the need for electron correlation corrections to the Cu d-orbitals. Superconductivity is excluded by known mechanisms that require the material to be metallic. We resolve previously observed inconsistencies between density functional theory results and experimental findings related to doping site energetics, crystal structure, and transparency. We find that Cu doping either Pb site leads to CuO₄ coordination and a similar unit cell volume contraction. Engineering materials with dopant sites that have different local symmetries can induce non-relativistic spin splitting-often referred to as altermagnetism. However, in the case of localized charges, this may enable spins to be individually controlled.

PaperPDFCode

Code

alexandrub53/dopedinsulators officialmentioned in papermentioned on GitHub report

Repository list and official/mentioned flags are the archive's, frozen 2025-07-28. Reachability, where shown, is from one Syntology probe window (2026-09-16 to 2026-09-18); repositories not probed show nothing. GitHub stars are not tracked.

Code Syntology ran Syntology

Not run by Syntology. Nothing on this page verifies that the listed code works.

Results from the paper archive 2025-07-28

No leaderboard rows for this paper in the archive.

Report a problem or propose a change · a person checks every report against the paper or source before anything changes; decisions are listed on /corrections